Massachusetts early
voting starts this Monday and one of the most controversial issues on the
ballot is whether we should expand the number of Charter Schools.
The clear and certain
answer is "No." Sold when first proposed as educational innovation
labs with new teaching techniques to be tested at Charters and then introduced
into traditional District schools, Charters have instead become stand-alone places
where the only innovation is to get rid of students who are tough to teach.
Kids who don't want to wear school uniforms, who have discipline issues, who
have trouble getting to school on time or who simply don't fit their Charter
School's model of teaching are often informally 'counselled out' and sent back
back to their Districts. In District after District, there is no innovation to
be learned from the Charter Schools' method of cherry-picking their students. http://www.craigkelley.org/…/state-data-clearly-shows-char…/
In addition to their
horrific attrition rates, Charters cost the donating Districts real and
significant tax dollars. Cambridge alone spends $11,000,000 of property tax
revenue paying the tuitions for hundreds of students who attend Charter Schools
throughout the Boston area, schools over which Cambridge taxpayers and voters
have virtually no oversight. While donating districts get some initial
reimbursement from the state and will save some money by having fewer students
to educate, Charter School costs far outweigh their benefits.
Finally, Charter Schools
do not necessarily have better educational outcomes, they are a step backwards
for employment equity and they may have serious safety and teacher retention
problems. Even a generally favorable review in 2013 by Stanford's Center for
Research on Education Outcomes concludes that "charter school quality is
uneven across the states and across schools." Slate.com noted 2 months ago that
Charter Schools bust unions "By intimidating teachers. By scaring parents.
And sometimes by calling the cops." A March 2016 article in The Nation
leads off with the question "Why Has Charter School Violence Spiked at
Double the Rate of Public Schools?" And a 2010 paper from Vanderbilt's
National Center on School Choice states that "The rate that teachers leave
the profession and move between schools is significantly higher in charter
schools than in traditional public schools." As the Education Justice
program at the Education Law Center concluded years ago, "[I]t is clear
that charter schools are no panacea for improving education in this
country."
While public education is
far from perfect, more Charter Schools would only make it worse, not better.
But there are steps we should, and could, take now to improve our kids'
education. Helping the Massachusetts Teachers Association rework traditional
collective bargaining agreements to meet the realities of 21st century teaching
is at the top of the list. As is expanding low cost, or free, early childhood
education for our most vulnerable residents. And working to alleviate poverty
and provide hope for students throughout the state. The list of what needs to
be done goes on and on but nowhere on that list is "Expand Charter
Schools."
In short, Charter Schools
shed their students at terrifyingly high rates, provide no meaningful
innovation for traditional districts, cost taxpayers real tax dollars, threaten
traditional American work rules and have no clear advantage in educational
outcomes. Instead they represent a sophisticated attempt to privatize public
education, are not scalable to meet our state's wider educational needs and
will leave our traditional Districts with fewer resources to teach their own
students.
So, put a stop to this
educational fraud and vote "NO on 2" starting Monday.
Craig Kelley, JD, MPA
Cambridge City Council
Cambridge City Council
No comments:
Post a Comment